Measuring What Matters in African Education

Access to education has expanded dramatically across Africa, but learning outcomes remain critically low. D4Act provides the evidence base to understand why - and what works to close the gap between enrollment and actual learning.

A+ 95%

The Learning Crisis in Sub-Saharan Africa

The World Bank estimates that 87% of children in Sub-Saharan Africa are in "learning poverty" - unable to read and understand a simple text by age 10. While gross enrollment in primary education has risen above 90% in most countries, the quality of learning has not kept pace. D4Act's education practice tackles this paradox head-on.

We evaluate interventions ranging from structured pedagogy programs and teacher professional development to technology-assisted learning and school governance reforms. Each evaluation is designed to generate evidence that is directly usable by education ministries and implementing partners.

Education field
87%
Children in learning poverty
90%+
Primary enrollment rate
$1.5T
Annual GDP loss from learning crisis

"Expanding access to school buildings is not enough. Africa needs evidence on what happens inside classrooms - and how to make every minute of instruction count for actual learning."

- D4Act Education Practice

Our Education Focus Areas

Learning Outcomes Assessment

Designing and conducting standardized learning assessments, including early-grade reading and math evaluations (EGRA/EGMA) and national exam analysis. Our assessments measure not just what students know, but what instructional factors predict learning gains.

Teacher Effectiveness & Training

Evaluating teacher professional development programs, coaching interventions, and incentive systems. Research shows teacher quality is the single strongest in-school predictor of student learning - yet most African teacher training systems remain focused on credentials over competence.

EdTech & Digital Learning

Assessing the impact of tablets, e-learning platforms, and AI-powered tutoring in low-resource classrooms. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated digital learning adoption, but evidence on effectiveness in African contexts remains thin - D4Act is generating that evidence.

TVET & Skills Development

Evaluating technical and vocational education programs that prepare Africa's youth for the job market. With 12 million young Africans entering the workforce annually, evidence-based skills training is critical for economic transformation.

Our Education Approach

Our end-to-end methodology - from initial assessment to sustainable impact.

📚 Education Éducation INTERVENTION DOMAINS Learning Outcomes Résultats d'apprentissage Standardized assessments Classroom observation Learning progression analytics Education System Analytics Analytique système éducatif EMIS data optimization Teacher deployment models Dropout early-warning EdTech & Digital Learning EdTech & numérique Adaptive learning platforms Content effectiveness Digital skills assessment Policy & Planning Politiques & planification Sector plan evaluation Budget-outcome mapping Equity gap analysis INTERVENTION VALUE CHAIN 1 Baseline Base 2 Intervene Intervenir 3 Monitor Suivre 4 Evaluate Évaluer 5 Inform Policy Informer AFRICAN-LED · EVIDENCE-BASED · LOCALLY OWNED · GLOBALLY RIGOROUS

Frequently asked questions

What learning-assessment instruments do you use?

Validated tools standard across the field - EGRA (early grade reading), EGMA (early grade mathematics), MELQO for early childhood, GLAD / GLAD+ for upper-primary, ASER-style oral fluency tests, and item-banked assessments aligned to national curricula where available. For international benchmarking we cross-walk to PIRLS, TIMSS, SACMEQ and PASEC.

Can you evaluate edtech, structured pedagogy and teacher-training programmes?

Yes. Our methodological core is RCT or quasi-experimental design (difference-in-differences, regression discontinuity, propensity-score matching), with effect sizes reported in standard deviations and grade-level equivalents. We follow the J-PAL and RISE evidence-base templates so findings are comparable to the cumulative literature, not just internal targets.

How do you support ministries on system-level reform?

We work alongside ministries of education on the underlying data architecture - EMIS modernisation, learning-assessment design, district-level dashboards, and cost-effectiveness analysis (cost per child reading, cost per standard deviation of learning gain). The aim is institutional ownership: a system the ministry can run and trust, not a black-box dashboard.

Do you handle gender, disability and equity dimensions?

By default. Sampling is designed for gender-disaggregated and disability-disaggregated analysis from inception. We use the Washington Group Short Set on Functioning for disability identification and apply equity-sensitive metrics (concentration index, Lorenz curves, learning poverty by quintile) so the report shows who is being left behind, and by how much.